|
|
ACCOUNTING GUIDE
|
|||||
E-Business and AccountingE-Business Case in Point: Iddex When Raymond Ee and Laura Moran planned the start-up of Iddex, their intellectual property management e-business, the co-founders worked out all the details of traditional business activities such as recruiting and marketing. In addition, they spent a great deal of time investigating which country would be the best base for their operations. The list of possible locations included Switzerland, the United States, Hong Kong, and Bermuda. The entrepreneurs were particularly concerned with each country's taxation policies, especially plans to tax Internet sales. They also looked at the privacy regulations, political climate, and telecommunications infrastructure in each area. After comparing each country's restrictions and opportunities, Ee and Moran decided to open Iddex in Switzerland. Given the global nature of e-commerce, more e-businesses are likely to follow a similar process when selecting their locations.
Source: Jennifer Jones, "Some E-Businesses Lured Overseas: Start-Ups Hope To Take Advantage of Breaks, Benefits Outside the United States," InfoWorld, February 28, 2000, p. 30.
Current events news summaries: America Online was fined $3.5 million for spreading subscriber acquisition costs over 24 months rather than writing them off as current expenses. What did the Securities and Exchange Commission have to say? http://www.ecommercetimes.com/news/articles2000/000516-4.shtml The European Union may levy a value-added tax (VAT) on services purchased via the Internet and delivered to customers within Europe. What would this tax cover? http://cnnfn.com/2000/06/08/europe/eu_vat/ Support for Internet taxation is also building in the United States. What are the current arguments for and against? http://www.ecommercetimes.com/news/articles2000/000717-3.shtml Virtual accounting is only one of the topics e-business CFOs are thinking about. How are companies handling accounting in the Internet age? http://www.ecommercetimes.com/news/articles2000/000726-4.shtml
|
E-Business and AccountingE-Business Case in Point: Amazon.com Aggressive accounting techniques are again in the e-commerce spotlight. The U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) is now investigating how Amazon.com calculates revenues. The e-tailer reports as revenues the stock it receives from e-businesses whose sites are promoted on the Amazon.com siteóa practice that's legal but may be regarded by the SEC as too aggressive. Amazon.com is also reporting fulfillment costs (such as maintaining warehouses) as selling, general, and administrative (SGA) expenses, rather than as items under cost of goods sold. This makes its gross margin appear better. As a result, Amazon.com's gross margin in 2000 is about 24%, although it would be only 14% if fulfillment costs were included under cost of goods sold. Meanwhile, the Financial Accounting Standards Board is going to allow companies to include fulfillment costs either under SGA or somewhere else on the income statement. If these costs are shown elsewhere, however, they must be detailed in a footnote. Amazon.com has already said it doesn't plan to change its accounting practices, and other e-businesses have also indicated that they will continue using the SGA category for fulfillment costs. Unlike the FASB, the SEC would like to see more consistency: "To have two companies account for the same thing differently cannot be the same thing for investors," states an SEC professional accounting fellow.
Current events news summaries:
The goal of the Streamlined Sales Tax Project is to "simplify and modernize sales and use tax administration." How will this effect taxation of online sales? A survey of Web shoppers shows that online spending would decrease if such purchases were subject to sales tax. What are the positions of industry groups and government officials? Accounting irregularities led Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products, a high-tech company based in Belgium, to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection so it could sort things out. What happened? |
|
|
© 2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. A Pearson Company Legal Notice |